Showing posts with label discussion_boards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label discussion_boards. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Some thoughts on Discussion Grading

A faculty member emailed me about my thoughts on grading discussions. She was thinking of posts worth 50% of the total grade and students would either earn all of the points or none. But she wondered if this was too harsh and asked for my feedback. I thought I'd share some of my response.
***********************************
I think it is possible to convey the importance of the discussion without having an all or nothing grading scheme. Indeed, when there are high stakes assignments in classes, studies show that tends to lead to more plagiarism. So you might get more engaged and authentic work if you grade based on the quality of the interactions and increased the chance that they would get at least some credit for their efforts. 

In my discussions (worth 30% of the grade) I give about 50% of the credit for simply making the minimum posts (1 main post and 3 replies on at least 3 different days).  The remaining credit is based on the quality of their interactions, which I judge based on a fairly simple rubric (pasted below). 

Additionally, I provide model posts from students in previous quarters, so students have a clear idea of what good work looks like. I also post announcements pointing out quality posts (I do in in announcements because I do not generally participate in the discussion board). 

In the first two weeks of the class, I give very detailed feedback individually on each student’s post.  This is a lot of work, but by week 3, everyone knows what is expected and grading is a breeze for the rest of the quarter.

Discussion Rubric:
SCORE: 

INITIAL POSTING (15 points):
* This posting reflected that the student read and understood the assigned material, referring specifically to assigned reading or related research - Yes
The posting has a clear purpose: to inform, persuade, or raise an interesting question. It may also provoke conversation or offer an opposing view of the devil's advocate - Yes
The posting refers to outside sources in supporting its arguments - Yes
The post answered the question presented, meets the word requirement of 150 to 350 words, is timely and has no proofing or spelling errors - Yes

REPLIES: (15 points, 3 x 5 posts)
Replies are substantive and reflect that the student read and thought about the student’s post, the assigned reading and any additional sources posted by the person they are replying to - Yes
The reply moves the conversation forward or makes a reply to a question asked in response to their own posting - Yes
Replies are timely and posted on a variety of days – Yes

Overall (points deducted if missing)
* Posts are made on 3 or more days
* Student replies to some of the replies to the initial post